ICMoat Dive
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. ICE Moat
Intercontinental Exchange's recurring revenue rose in every one of the last ten quarters, from $357M to $416M, without a single down period.
Its annual report never names its largest competitor once, while that competitor names it explicitly.
Key data
The moat
Three moats in one company and they work differently.
The strongest is the oil benchmark. Brent is the reference price in physical crude contracts worldwide, and a price assessment becomes a benchmark only by everyone already using it. Once written into supply agreements it cannot be displaced by a better contract, because the switching decision belongs to thousands of counterparties at once. Open interest in the contract reached a record 8.3 million, roughly twice its nearest rival's.
The second is the clearing house, which works the same way CME's does: margin offsets make positions expensive to move. The third is mortgage software, where a lender that originates loans on the platform has rebuilt its entire workflow around it.
What the strongest moat produces is a recurring revenue line that has never declined.
Widening or narrowing
The recurring half compounds and the transaction half swings.
| Quarter | Recurring revenue | Data and connectivity | Transaction revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2024 | $357M | $235M | $866M |
| Q4 2024 | $353M | $230M | $883M |
| Q2 2025 | $378M | $255M | $1.04B |
| Q4 2025 | $391M | $266M | $973M |
| Q1 2026 | $405M | $277M | $1.38B |
| Q2 2026 | $416M | $287M | $1.05B |
Data and connectivity rose in every quarter across ten. Recurring revenue rose in every quarter bar one small dip. Transaction revenue spiked to $1.38B in March 2026 on rate and energy volatility and fell back, which is what event-driven revenue does.
The overrated case. The recurring growth is real and it is 4 to 6% a year, which is a utility rate rather than a compounding one. The exciting quarters come from volatility, and volatility is not a moat. A reader who annualises the March 2026 quarter is annualising a geopolitical event.
The debt deserves stating. The company carries roughly $19.6B and discloses it as a competitive disadvantage risk, and has since raised $3.73B more plus a $2.0B term loan to fund an acquisition of the leading electronic credit venue. Buying a rival whose own disclosed market share fell four years running is a defensible price and it is not a growth purchase.
On profit pool, ICE holds the fat slice in mortgage software, where it charges per loan on a process worth thousands, and thin uncontested slices in benchmarks and clearing.
The moat is widening.
Inside the complete Moat Dive
- 01What breaks it, and who
- 02Closing
- 03Methodology
Continue with ICE
Get the complete Moat Dive free.
Choose this as your free complete report. No card required.
Read the complete reportAlready a member? Sign in
