Bid Cap
Company library Banks

Back of Napkin

PJT Partners Inc. PJT

Three-pass checked

PJT Partners grew a record second quarter 20% with all three of its engines, strategic advisory, private capital, and restructuring, rising at once, a combination the model was explicitly designed to produce.

The setup turns on price: 22 times this year's estimate is the premium multiple of the boutique group, awarded for balance the market currently gets to observe but has not yet had to lean on.

PJT · price with moving averages

Daily · 6MWeekly · 3Y
$63$97$130$164$197 Sep '23Apr '24Nov '24Jun '25Jan '26Sep '26 Bid Cap
EMAs82140

Source: market data.

The business

PJT Partners is an independent advisory bank: no lending, no market-making, no balance sheet to speak of, just senior people selling advice. Three engines. Strategic Advisory counsels boards on selling companies, buying them, spinning off divisions, and defending against activists. Restructuring and Special Situations, the group Paul Taubman inherited when he carved the firm out of Blackstone in 2015, is among the two or three most respected debt-workout practices in the world, the one creditors and failing companies call when the money runs out. Park Hill raises money for private funds and arranges side deals for their investors. The moat is reputational density: a handful of bankers whose names open the boardroom door, and a restructuring franchise built over decades that a new entrant cannot simply hire. What a client actually pays for is one partner's phone number at 2 a.m., the same reason the desk survived the quiet default years intact.

The numbers

The story is a business compounding through a strong market and, so far, showing no sign of slowing. Revenue has climbed every year since 2021, and the last five quarters carry it forward.

QuarterRevenueNet incomeAdj. EPS
Q2 2025$406.9M$61.4M$1.54
Q3 2025$447.1M$75.0M$1.85
Q4 2025$535.2M$99.2M$2.55
Q1 2026$418.2M$89.3M$1.54
Q2 2026$486.3M$81.3M$1.97

The scoreboard the setup watches has held: all three engines kept growing, and Q2 revenue rose 19.5% over the same quarter last year, the biggest first half on record. The December quarter is seasonally the heavy one, so the full year should again top out there. One figure the growth story explains poorly sits in the table, revenue rising from Q1 to Q2 while reported profit slipped, and it comes from an unusual first-quarter tax benefit rather than any softening, the kind of noise the adjusted per-share line strips out.

Fiscal yearRevenueNet incomeFree cash flow
FY2021$0.99B$190.0M$117.7M
FY2022$1.03B$164.8M$239.3M
FY2023$1.15B$145.7M$437.6M
FY2024$1.49B$238.5M$527.7M
FY2025$1.71B$309.7M$480.4M

Over 2022 to 2025 revenue compounded at 18.7% a year and per-share earnings at about 24%, faster than revenue because the firm turns roughly a third of every dollar into free cash. Free cash flow ran $480M last year against a company worth about $4.7B in listed shares, though the true economic value, counting the partnership units, is closer to $7.9B. Against the adjusted earnings the Street tracks, the multiple sits near the top of its post-spin range. The print that settles whether this is share gain or just a good market: whether advisory revenue holds the next time announced deal volume contracts.

Management

Taubman runs the firm the way an owner does, because he is one. His stake runs into the low billions, and his pay last year was a $1M salary with no bonus and no stock, about a third of a percent of profit. That is the alignment signal that matters most here. Insider selling over the past year was small and routine, about $3.7M across eight officer sales, under a tenth of a percent of the company, none of it a flag. The firm has spent about $760M on buybacks over five years, leaning in hardest in 2024 near $119 a share, yet the share count still rose about 7.5%, because units issued to partners outrun the repurchases. Here the buyback offsets dilution more than it shrinks the company.

How it fails or surprises you

The deal cycle turns and advisory shrinks. About two thirds of revenue is M&A and capital-markets advice, which tracks announced deal volume. If a rate shock or a freeze locks up dealmaking through 2027, strategic revenue can fall 20% or more in a year, as it did across 2022 into 2023. The tell shows first in the announced-transaction backlog described on the next two earnings calls.

Credit finally cracks and restructuring floods in (right tail). The market prices PJT as an M&A-recovery play and assigns little value to the counter-cyclical engine. A genuine default cycle, the first real one since 2020, could send restructuring revenue up sharply while every rival's advisory line falls. The tell is restructuring mandates and distressed activity climbing while strategic slows, the two lines moving opposite on a single call.

Dilution keeps outrunning the buyback. Shares grew 7.5% over three years despite $760M repurchased. If partner grants and unit exchanges keep pace with or exceed buybacks, per-share compounding lags the business and the 24% earnings growth quietly erodes toward the slower revenue rate. The number to watch is the diluted share count on each annual report, up or flat.

Closing thoughts

The evidence points to a good business bought at a full price in a good market. This is mostly a distribution the market already prices: at about 23 times earnings, near the highest the stock has fetched since 2015, the buyer is paying up for proven compounding and betting it continues. The fatter risk is the left one, a deal-cycle stall against a multiple with little cushion, and what is at stake is a re-rating down as much as a fall in profit. The offsetting prize is the restructuring option the price barely counts, which pays exactly when the rest of the business hurts.

The bet, restated, is that companies keep hiring PJT's bankers for their hardest moments, and that the firm earns whether times are good or bad because the restructuring desk fills when deals empty. What breaks it is a market where deals freeze and credit still does not crack, leaving both engines idle at once. The pair of numbers that tells you first: announced strategic backlog falling while restructuring mandates stay flat. If those two move down together, the hedge that justifies the price was never there.

Methodology

Sector frame: independent advisory investment banking, three-engine cyclical hedge, reputational-density moat.

Basis: earnings and P/E stated on the adjusted (fully-exchanged) basis the sector trades on, since GAAP diluted EPS is distorted by the Up-C partnership-unit structure; forward FY2026E P/E derived from the +35% first-half adjusted-EPS trajectory, not vendor consensus.

Data gaps: segment revenue split (Strategic / Restructuring / Park Hill) not pulled this run, so the three-engine mix is described qualitatively; listed market cap ($4.7B) and vendor EV/EBITDA understate economic value (≈$7.9B) because they exclude partnership units.

Bundle: Q2 2026 10-Q filed 2026-07-30, fiscal 2025 10-K filed 2026-02-26, proxy filed 2026-04-29; vendor market data as of 2026-09-05.

Fact check: Bundle financials reconciled to FMP; adjusted EPS figures from company earnings releases; one correction: Taubman's $1M salary is 0.32% of net income, not "about half a percent" as initially drafted. All price, growth, capital allocation, and management figures verified against filed quarterly/annual statements and proxy. Final analysis verified as of Sep 6, 2026.

Bid Cap

Daily ideas, a 390-name database, and a model long/short book from an investor who mostly covers financials. $70 a month or $700 a year.

Subscribe on Substack