BID TerminalOpen complete report
Research library Industrials & Energy

Moat Dive

EQT Corporation EQT Moat

Three-pass checkedFresh as companies report

EQT produced more gas in each of the last four years, from 1,940 to 2,382 billion cubic feet equivalent.

Its production costs rose 19.7% in the first half of 2026 against the first half of 2025.

Key data

Moat proofFY2022
Production1,940 Bcfe
Proved reserves25,003 Bcfe
Reserve life12.9 years
Production cost per unitnot computed
Production costs, first half 2026$180.0M, 2025
EQT · one year · last $54.82 · range $48.85 to $67.93

The moat

EQT's advantage is geology plus geography. It holds a very large contiguous acreage position in the Appalachian basin, where the gas is shallow enough and thick enough that a well costs less per unit produced than almost anywhere in North America, and it owns the pipelines that take the gas away.

That combination is the moat. Acreage cannot be manufactured, and the midstream ownership removes the tariff that other producers in the same basin pay to a third party for the same journey.

What it produces is the lowest place on the cost curve, which in a commodity is the only durable position there is.

Widening or narrowing

The volume line is clean and the cost line has turned.

YearProductionProved reservesReserve life
20221,940 Bcfe25,003 Bcfe12.9 years
20232,016 Bcfe27,597 Bcfe13.7 years
20242,228 Bcfe26,265 Bcfe11.8 years
20252,382 Bcfe28,046 Bcfe11.8 years

Production rose in every one of the four years, up 23% in total, with no down year. Reserves ended 12% higher than they started, so the company replaced everything it produced and added more.

Reserve life is the line that moved against it. It rose to 13.7 years in 2023 and has sat at 11.8 for two years, because production grew faster than reserves did. Producing more from the same asset base shortens the runway, which is arithmetic rather than mismanagement, and it is still shorter.

Production costs are the direct moat measure and they rose. The first half of 2026 cost $215.5M against $180.0M a year earlier, up 19.7%, on a quarterly path of $88.4M, $91.5M, $98.3M, $110.4M, $115.2M and $100.3M.

The overrated case. A low-cost position is only a moat while the cost stays low. Production costs rising nearly twenty percent in a year while production grows in the low single digits per quarter means the unit cost is going the wrong way, and unit cost is the entire argument for owning the lowest-cost producer rather than any other one.

On profit pool, EQT sells a molecule at a price set in a market it does not influence, and keeps the difference between that price and its cost. All of the durable value is in the cost side, which is why the cost series matters more than the revenue series here.

The moat is narrowing.

Inside the complete Moat Dive

  1. 01What breaks it, and who
  2. 02Closing
  3. 03Methodology

Continue with EQT

Get the complete Moat Dive free.

Choose this as your free complete report. No card required.

Read the complete report