BID TerminalOpen complete report
Research library Software & Internet

Moat Dive

Q2 Holdings, Inc. QTWO Moat

Three-pass checkedFresh as companies report

Q2's net revenue retention has risen three years running, from 108% to 113%, meaning every cohort of banks spends more each year than the last.

Its nearest listed competitor is growing revenue at 33% against Q2's 14%, with a higher retention rate.

Key data

Moat proofFY2023
Net revenue retention108%
Subscription net revenue retention112%
Subscription annual recurring revenue$594M
Registered users22.0M
Revenue churn6.1%
QTWO · one year · last $65.33 · range $42.09 to $84.24

The moat

A community bank's mobile app is the bank, as far as the customer is concerned. Q2 builds it, hosts it, connects it to the core ledger and to the payment rails, and keeps it compliant. Once a bank's customers have been through an app migration, the executives who authorised it will not authorise another for a decade, because every migration produces a wave of login failures and complaints that lands on the branch staff.

That is a switching cost carried by the customer's customers, which is the version banks fear most. It is reinforced by integration: the app plugs into the core system, the lending workflow and the fraud tools, and replacing it means re-testing all of them.

What it produces is expansion within accounts. Retention above 100% means existing banks buy more each year without anyone selling to a new one.

Widening or narrowing

Every retention series has risen and the revenue line has been unusually steady.

PeriodNet revenue retentionSubscription retentionSubscription recurring revenue
FY2023108%112%$594M
FY2024109%114%$682M
FY2025113%115%$780M
June 2025$716M
June 2026$826M

*Blank cells are periods for which the company discloses the metric only annually.*

Revenue growth has run between 13% and 15% for seven consecutive quarters with no inflection in either direction, which is rare and reflects a subscription book rather than a sales cycle. Registered users grew from 22.0M to 27.8M.

The overrated case. Two things sit against the retention story. Revenue churn improved from 6.1% to 4.4% and then worsened to 5.2% in fiscal 2025, so the trend is not monotonic and the most recent year moved the wrong way. And retention above 110% at a company growing 14% means the growth is almost entirely expansion inside existing banks rather than new logos, which is the version that stops when the installed base is fully penetrated.

The larger issue is what the comparison shows. Alkami, the directly comparable listed platform, grew fiscal 2025 revenue 33% to $444M against Q2's 14% to $795M, and reports a higher retention rate. Q2 is nearly twice the size and growing at less than half the rate, which is what losing new logos looks like before it shows up anywhere in retention.

On profit pool, Q2 takes a per-user subscription from a bank whose own economics are made of deposit spread. A modest slice, contracted for years, and paid whether the bank grows or not.

The moat is widening inside the installed base.

Inside the complete Moat Dive

  1. 01What breaks it, and who
  2. 02Closing
  3. 03Methodology

Continue with QTWO

Get the complete Moat Dive free.

Choose this as your free complete report. No card required.

Read the complete report